<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TCPglobal &#187; Lexmark’s X560n fares much better against its competition than most of its stable-mates</title>
	<link>http://tcpblogal.com</link>
	<description>Total Cost of Printing - news, views, issues and discussions</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Lexmark’s X560n fares much better against its competition than most of its stable-mates</title>
		<link>http://tcpblogal.com/total-cost-of-printing/lexmark%e2%80%99s-x560n-fares-much-better-against-its-competition-than-most-of-its-stable-mates/</link>
		<comments>http://tcpblogal.com/total-cost-of-printing/lexmark%e2%80%99s-x560n-fares-much-better-against-its-competition-than-most-of-its-stable-mates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jonno</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Comparisons]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Total Cost of Printing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tcpblogal.com/total-cost-of-printing/lexmark%e2%80%99s-x560n-fares-much-better-against-its-competition-than-most-of-its-stable-mates/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Issue #0805/1 - With higher than expected purchase price and lower than expected running costs, Lexmark’s new X560n, four-function colour laser MFP looks to be more attractive as a multifunction device for small businesses and workgroups than we have come to expect from Lexmark.  Pitched against Brother’s MFC-9440CN, Dell’s 3115cn, Oki’s C5550MFP and Xerox’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tcpblogal.com/total-cost-of-printing/lexmark%e2%80%99s-x560n-fares-much-better-against-its-competition-than-most-of-its-stable-mates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

