<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TCPglobal &#187; 33 -35ppm - Lexmark T640 and Xerox Phaser 3500  </title>
	<link>http://tcpblogal.com</link>
	<description>Total Cost of Printing - news, views, issues and discussions</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>33 -35ppm - Lexmark T640 and Xerox Phaser 3500</title>
		<link>http://tcpblogal.com/total-cost-of-printing/33-35ppm-lexmark-t640-and-xerox-phaser-3500/</link>
		<comments>http://tcpblogal.com/total-cost-of-printing/33-35ppm-lexmark-t640-and-xerox-phaser-3500/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 23:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Bartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[New Products]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Pricing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Comparisons]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Financials]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Total Cost of Printing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tcpblogal.com/total-cost-of-printing/33-35ppm-lexmark-t640-and-xerox-phaser-3500/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Issue #0539/2 - Expensive to operate, neither printer presents as a low cost option but Lexmark’s T640 has flexible paper handling options. 
In the next category, Lexmark’s T640 and Xerox’s Phaser 3500 sit at a 33ppm print speed within a group of competing printers offering print speeds between 33ppm and 35ppm.
Lexmark’s T640 is typically placed [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tcpblogal.com/total-cost-of-printing/33-35ppm-lexmark-t640-and-xerox-phaser-3500/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

