<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TCPglobal &#187; New Energy Star -  what manufacturers say </title>
	<link>http://tcpblogal.com</link>
	<description>Total Cost of Printing - news, views, issues and discussions</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 16:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>New Energy Star -  what manufacturers say</title>
		<link>http://tcpblogal.com/issues/new-energy-star-what-manufacturers-say/</link>
		<comments>http://tcpblogal.com/issues/new-energy-star-what-manufacturers-say/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Bartley</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tcpblogal.com/issues/new-energy-star-what-manufacturers-say/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Issue #0713/3 - Only three manufacturers have made a clear statement regarding where they stand on the new standard. 
Few manufacturers have made announcements so far, or any information available, regarding their position with the new 1.0 Energy Star standard.
Some sources have suggested that the rigid new rules will result in only one-quarter of existing [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://tcpblogal.com/issues/new-energy-star-what-manufacturers-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

